Food and Farming–The Debate Rolls On

January 20th, 2010

Many thanks to my brother, Chris, for forwarding me Joel Kotkin’s Forbes article, America’s Agricultural Angst. I have to admit I smiled when Kotkin referred to Michael Pollan as an “agri-intellectual.” A new breed has been born! But maybe that’s not such a bad thing. Pollan and similarly-opinioned food and farming journalists question the status quo, which is useful in any freethinking, progressive society. What’s also important, however, is dialogue and equal coverage of divergent viewpoints. Kotkin’s defense of the real accomplishments of modern American agriculture is overdue and definitely worth a read.

What do you think?

On an unrelated note, here’s a follow-up photo of the Great Freeze of 2009. As you may recall, we abandoned the Rumsey mandarin crop after the oranges froze on the trees. This photo taken two days ago shows how the frozen mandarins rotted on the branch. A real shame.

Rotten Mandarins

The Facts About Food and Farming

January 11th, 2010

Back in October I attended a dinner to promote Michael Pollan’s documentary, The Botany of Desire. Not surprisingly, conversation drifted away from the film and toward Pollan’s more famous work, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. The author graciously answered questions from the group, discussing the hazards of monoculture, the agri-industrial complex, and the ubiquity of cheap processed food. I listened quietly and was struck by a strange thought. Nearly every one at the gathering (a major donors event for KQED) seemed to agree with Pollan and talked about agriculture as though they owned the issue, while not a single farmer, around whom the whole discussion revolved, was present. It was one-sided to say the least. And that to me is at the heart of the often acrimonious food and farming debate. There is no dialogue between the ag-reform-minded, often urban, ”food” crowd and actual farmers. Instead the two poles of the farming debate spend their time “debating” with like-minded people, preaching to the converted, talking right past each other.

So it was with great pleasure that I stumbled upon a recent article by Los Angeles Times food columnist, Russ Parsons. Finally a nuanced look at the food and farming debate! What immediately won me over was his first point: farming is a business. It’s not altruistic. Most farmers don’t make a whole lot of money anyway. To begrudge them technological advances that might increase their income is to expect a degree of self-sacrifice that is not only unrealistic  but also unfair.

This struck home on a personal level this winter when a freeze wiped out part of our mandarin crop. As I’ve said before, there are so many things beyond control in farming: freezes, drought, market conditions. One can understand why a farmer wants to even the odds by using whatever he or she can to boost production, to try to insulate income, as much as possible, from income-killers over which there is no control. In medicine, we call such technological advances progress. In agriculture,  they’re called short-sighted or morally wrong.

Now I’m not saying I advocate the status quo, but ag reform is a tough, complex issue. And if some ground rules for dialogue, like those suggested by Parsons, are established, maybe we’ll move beyond acrimony into something more like progress.

Simple Pleasures–Fresh-Squeezed Orange Juice

January 7th, 2010

Sometimes when I read about the processing of food in America I find myself overwhelmed. Michael Pollan’s exposure of the cornification of our country in The Omnivore’s Dilemma and Eric Schlosser’s descriptions of the perverse manipulation of food flavors in Fast Food Nation make me look at food with an anxious, uncertain eye. What am I eating? And does it bear any resemblance to what I really think it is?

As a farmer’s daughter, I grew up knowing where my food came from. We had our own cattle slaughtered and stored the packaged meat in our freezer. My mother laboriously prepared green beans straight from the field, which we packaged and froze for the coming months. I never had a jar of jam that didn’t come from our own produce. But now? I live in the city, and my father, though he still produces multiple crops, doesn’t grow the diversity necessary for a well-balanced diet. Both of us are patrons of supermarkets and all the brightly packaged products there.

Like many others, I yearn for a clearer, more transparent vision of one of the most basic aspects of life–eating. I guess I’ve reached the point where I don’t care if there’s a pound of butter in the recipe. I just want to know what the ingredients are. And if I don’t know what half the ingredients in a processed food are– then why am I eating it? It might as well be Soylent Green. 

Which brings me to the topic of fresh-squeezed orange juice. I’ve never been a big juice drinker, but I love fresh-squeezed orange juice. The taste is unmatched. And I’m lucky, as the daughter of a citrus-producer, to have access to as many organic mandarin oranges as I want. My father hooked me. He drinks fresh-squeezed mandarin juice every day in season, squeezing it with a simple old electric juicer ($20.99 at Target!).

The beauty of fresh-squeezed juice is that not only does it taste so outrageously good, but you also know exactly what it is. The processing is simple and done by you. Not only that, the nutrition is outstanding. An 8-oz glass provides 100% of the RDA for Vitamin C,  as well quality amounts of thiamine, folate, and potassium. It’s good for you, it tastes great, and it’s pure. What’s not to like about that?

If you contrast that with some of the reconstituted orange juices in the store… well, I won’t go into that beyond to say there’s nothing local about that juice (think Brazil) and some of the ingredients aren’t listed on the container. So again, as mantra for 2010, I keep coming back to Keep It Simple. There’s something really lovely about going slow, knowing where you’re going, and savoring the steps along the way.

Books You Gotta Read?

January 4th, 2010

When I first started this blog back in September, I originally envisioned a blog about food, healthy lifestyles, farming, and good books. I think I’ve covered most of those topics, except where are the books? 2009 was marked by lots of action– crop-destroying freezes, new olive tree plantings, the swine flu epidemic. With so much to write about, who has time for books?

The answer is: we all do. Books are long slow drinks in a gulping internet-fed information age. When I feel barraged by all the short-clip information blasted at me by my web browser and iPhone, I stop and remember why I always return to the bound volume. In this frenetic and crazed world, books offer developed thought. Tell me how you get that in a 140-character Tweet?

So what long-form, anachronistic printed item am I reading? Don’t laugh. I’ve gone rogue and am reading Sarah Palin’s new book. There’s much to laugh about Going Rogue, from the glammy cover portrait of a smiling Sarah looking upwards and off into a shining maverick future, to the down-home plain-spoken writing style, which somewhere, somehow must have had a ghost writer’s imprint.  Yet, I cannot deny, the book is somehow very interesting to me. It’s a monstrous spin on a very conservative woman’s actions and viewpoints. I find myself putting the book down, searching the internet for another tell-all about Sarah to balance this portrayal. There isn’t one that I’ve found– I wonder where all those New York Times reporters have been?

Now, I didn’t buy this book, so I have no guilt about padding Sarah’s pockets as I read it. But I have to admit, I’m glad I’m reading it. There’s no point having a viewpoint if you can’t face exposing yourself to someone else’s. It’s the only way to understand others, and Sarah Palin, much as some of us don’t like it, represents a huge segment of the American population.

That being said, if you want to be like me and dabble in the opposition without shelling out a cent for the view, you can always get a copy at the library– or you can borrow mine.

New Year’s Resolution–Avoiding Portion Distortion

December 27th, 2009

It seems we’re doomed to be fat. I know this might not be what you want to hear when you’ve just come off a Christmas caloric binge, but a recent article in the Annals of Internal Medicine shocked me. Just when you thought the only safe nutritional path left was to make your own food, it turns out that even our old beloved cookbooks have been betraying us, packing more calories into old-time favorite recipes.

According to the article, which examined 18 recipes in successive editions of The Joy of Cooking published over the past 70 years, calories per serving has increased by two-thirds, from an average of 268 calories in 1936 to 437 calories in 2006. These are for the same recipes! The difference was attributed to portion size and to the actual ingredients. For example, the same amount of ingredients that formerly made 12 waffles now only makes 6. And recipes today might include more sugar, butter, and add-ins, such as raisins and nuts, to assuage our increasing cravings for sweetness and fat.

Throw in the increasing size of plates and utensils and you’ve got even more danger of portion distortion. According to a July 2007 article in the the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, plate size has increased by 36% since 1960. With bigger plates, there’s a lot more room to pile on those bigger portions. Even well-meaning experts aren’t immune to the deception of the bigger dinner plate. In a September 2007 article in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, nutrition experts, when given bigger bowls, unknowingly upped their food consumption by 31%. Similarly, bigger spoons led to a 14.5% increase in serving size ingested.

So is it any wonder that average daily caloric intake is up? It is, and it’s awful. According to this month’s edition of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Americans ate an average of 500 calories more per day between the early 1970s and the early 2000s. Children’s caloric consumption increased by an average of 350 calories in the same time. This might explain why Americans gained, on average, 19 pounds in the same period, while children gained nine.

So how about those New Year’s Resolutions? Smaller plates, bowls, and spoons? And watch for the good old cookbooks. Those calories are coming at you from everywhere!

Aftermath of the Freeze

December 16th, 2009

I went to the farm this weekend and walked the mandarin orchard with my father, pulling small oranges off trees and tasting them, trying to see which were still good and which had been ruined by last week’s sub-freezing temperatures. It was heartbreaking. At the Rumsey farm, more than 75% of the fruit has spoiled on the tree. With numbers like that, it doesn’t make sense to harvest the remaining mandarins. The workers would be forced to sort good from bad, and the yields wouldn’t warrant the labor expenses. As a consequence, we’ve decided to abandon Rumsey’s mandarins.

Fortunately, the damage is less severe at the Dunbar orchard. It looks like we’ve lost maybe 25% of the mandarins to the freeze. This may seem awful, but that means at least three-quarters of the fruit are still marketable. The only problem is that there isn’t a big market right now. It’s been a bumper crop for organic satsuma mandarins this year, and even a freeze hasn’t been able to correct an oversupply of marketable mandarins.

Which points out the always changing fortunes of the farmer. If it isn’t Mother Nature–wind, freezing temperatures or drought–it’s market conditions. I’ve always thought a farmer needed a stomach of steel to weather such uncertainties; there is so much beyond his or her control. By contrast, my job as a physician, with all the certainties afforded by modern medical technology, seems like a relative walk in the park.

Saving the Mandarins from the Cold

December 9th, 2009
Frozen Mandarins
Frozen Mandarins
If you’re a grower, this is a picture you never want to see. The temperature dropped down to 20 degrees last night, and in a bid to save the fruit on the trees, we turned on the sprinklers, raining water down that froze into eerie arctic-looking icicles.
 
The latest cold snap has been a brutal one. The last four nights have seen sub-freezing temperatures, the last two nights descending into the low twenties and teens. Ripe mandarin oranges can withstand temperatures in the low-twenties, provided it’s for a short period of time. But the last two nights have seen ten hours or more of freezing temperatures each night, and with 80% of our crop still on trees, could turn a bumper crop into a bust.
 
You might wonder with all our fears of cold weather why we’re purposely turning our trees into ice cubes. Spraying citrus trees with water is an old technique, designed to insulate the fruit from sub-freezing temperatures by covering them with a layer of 32 degree ice. We’ve run the sprinklers from sundown to sun up the last two nights, but with the prolonged periods of sub-freezing weather, it’s too early to tell if we’ve made a difference.
 
We’ll start picking again in a few days,  when the full extent of the damage will be evident.

Food Philosophy– How Cuties Got So Cute

December 2nd, 2009

Now that Thanksgiving 2009 is safely tucked behind us, I can get back to the case of the Cuties– which is not, though it may sound like it, an infectious disease but rather the case of  how even relatively simple sounding “whole foods” like oranges are processed to look so pretty and appealing. How you feel about the following will probably differ, but the processing of a non-organic mandarin orange is worth thinking about, if only to illustrate how powerful our manipulations have become to get fresh produce to people all year round.

Processed for Shelf-Life and Appearance
Processed for Shelf-Life and Appearance

The investigation began for me when I was looking for packaging for my father’s certified organic mandarins. I’d casually flip over 5-lb boxes of Cuties mandarin oranges to find the box manufacturer, and the labeling I saw instead shocked me: Cuties are treated with Imazalil or Thiabendazole. As a physician, I recognized thiabendazole as an anti-fungal that is also sometimes used to treat roundworm and hookworm. What was an anti-fungal doing in my mandarin orange, and how in heaven’s name did they apply it?

IMG_0742

It turns out that the antifungals are applied within the wax that coats Cuties. I didn’t know Cuties were waxed; I thought only cucumbers and apples were waxed. But apparently waxing is widespread throughout the non-organic produce section. In non-organic mandarin oranges, wax is applied after the fruit is washed because washing removes the fruit’s naturally-occurring protective wax.  Without this wax coat, mandarins becomes vulnerable to ”loss of aroma and weight” and fungal rot. In other words, they start getting old, fast. With a wax coat and antifungals, mandarin oranges can be stored in a climate controlled storage unit for nearly a month.

Wax Keeps Your Orange Youthful
Wax Keeps Your Orange Youthful

 It doesn’t stop there, either. Some mandarin oranges are gassed. That’s right, gassed. Ethylene gas is a naturally occurring gas given off by fruit, which acts as a ripening hormone. When gas levels are high enough, the fruit ripens. In the non-organic mandarin orange business, however, external ethylene gas is sometimes added to perfect the mandarins’ orange color. People in the business call this “degreening.” which is considered desirable because consumers associate a mandarin’s orange color with ripeness and sweetness. Green just doesn’t sell well.

So there you have it, the non-organic mandarin’s path to the produce aisle: it may be gassed to look orange and pretty. It will probably be waxed and treated with antifungals to stay looking pretty. The orange you eat may be a month old. Is this so bad? You decide. Some may call all this processing a great leap forward– you can get your mandarins for a longer season and they look awfully good. Others might say that it’s just one more step away from nature, that we are increasingly divorced from how our foods are produced and processed. I merely bring it up to encourage people to develop a food philosophy. How much processing is too much?

Olive Harvest–At Last

November 24th, 2009
Hand Harvesting Leccino Olives
Hand Harvesting Leccino Olives

I just returned from a lovely weekend harvesting our Leccino olives. The air was crisp, a bracing breeze blew, and the remnants of  a storm scattered clouds across the sky; it felt a lot like Fall, the perfect weather for the approaching Thanksgiving holiday, but maybe a little later than we wanted to harvest olives. Farming is a balancing act, however, pitting the dictates of nature against the availability of labor: walnut harvest stretched longer than planned due to some early season rainfall. The baby olive trees also needed to go into the ground before it became too cold. Thus the Leccino harvest was thrust third in line.

Which has implications for taste. Early harvest olives are greener, containing more of those wonderful antioxidants called polyphenols. Later harvest olives are generally smoother in taste, less bitter than pungent early season fruit, but also containing less polyphenols. Knowing when to pick is an art: balancing taste against the olive’s oil and polyphenol content. And of course, not all olives mature at the same rate, even on the same tree.

IMG_0704
Varying Degrees of Ripeness

Looking at these olives and some of the boxes of darker fruit, I predict we will have a sweeter oil than in previous years, although we won’t know for sure until we bottle the oil. Our olives pressed yesterday, so we should have a taste of the new oil soon.

Mandarins–Why Fresh is Best

November 17th, 2009

We live in an international food world. Your asparagus may come from Chile, your tomatoes from Mexico, and your apples from Australia. Thanks to a food labeling law that finally went into effect last year this information is no longer hidden. You can check the label and find out your food’s country of origin.  Which wound up being an eye opener for me when I looked in my cupboard recently.

Processed Mandarin Oranges

Processed Mandarin Oranges

My children love canned mandarin oranges. They’re soft, sweet, and bright orange. They’re also from China. It turns out that a large percentage of canned mandarins are grown and processed in China, which surprised me since there are many growers here in the United States. But the Chinese can do it cheaper, which is why they cornered the canned mandarin market.

Product of China

Product of China

Although there have been no reports recently of contaminated food products from China, I am still leery of eating food processed in a country with such a bad track record. And make no mistake about it, the mandarins in the can are processed: to get that not quite natural bright orange color, the orange segments are first dipped in scalding water and then subjected to a lye solution to dissolve the skins. Afterward they are rinsed several times in plain water and then packed in the can’s sugary syrup. This is a long step from the tree and explains why a canned mandarin doesn’t taste nearly as good as a fresh mandarin. There is no question that all that processing also takes a nutritional toll.

Which leads me to be thankful that we are now in mandarin season locally. Organic mandarins are about as safe as you can get, and they taste great. Stay tuned to find out the difference between certified organic mandarins and the ubiquitous Cuties. The difference may surprise you!